Pages

Thursday 3 January 2013

Can Socialism Really Guarantee the Forward Progression of Humankind?

Many Democrats believe that they had won the election and the voters gave them a mandate, and that their progressive ideas have been voted upon by the American people. However, I would submit to you the Democrats didn't win the election at all, rather they bought the election, and they bought it with US taxpayer's money. Why do I say this? Because there are 47 million people on food stamps, and I'm pretty sure that if you are getting free food, you probably don't want that to go away. And you probably and rightfully assumed that if the Republicans got elected, that there is a good chance that you might lose your free food, especially if you didn't really need it.

Many Democrats believe that they are the party of progress, and to them it means that we progress as a civilization and society to a more utopian concept. To do that, they believe we need more socialism. However it is the great abundance of the socioeconomic strategy of free-market capitalism which provides abundance. As the socialists engage in crony capitalism, vote buying, and their spendthrift ways they are hijacking the flows of capital, labor, resources, and money to the point that there is no longer economic efficiency.

Because of this they cannot afford to build their utopia and their grand ideas, as they run out of money. They run through all the money they have available, and they borrow the rest, until no one is stupid enough to lend them more money, because they've probably not only run out of all their money, but they run out of other people's money to take as well. Would like a case in point? Let me give you an example here.

In Physorg Online News there was an article on November 29, 2012 titled; "Italy cancels 1 Billion Euro SuperB Collider," particle accelerator project.

Whereas, many socialists consider themselves progressive, still, it's obvious that their agendas are not compatible with future technologies or the forward progression of the species. Let me give it to you in a nutshell; socialism is not progressive, it is regressive. It is a back-track from abundance. You can have a utopian society that wasn't built on efficiency, but apparently even though history has shown us time and time again that socialism doesn't work, political leaders are far too often standing ready to take up the cause.

In the short term they look okay, sometimes, but in the end it is always bad. Would you like some more present period examples; Venezuela, Argentina, Italy, Greece, Spain, and Portugal. Would you like some more? Stay tuned, we aren't that far behind if we keep up this nonsense of the Obama Administration. Please consider all this and think on it.

Lance Winslow has launched a new provocative series of eBooks on Economic Concepts. Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank; http://www.worldthinktank.net/


View the original article here

No comments:

Post a Comment