Pages

Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Ethics Education

Supervisors, managers and corporate executives are customarily held to a higher standard from that which we demand from common employees. This is to be anticipated since the upper echelon of corporate America is expected to be knowledgeable with all of the company's rules, be a capable leader and to set daily examples for the workers.

Unfortunately, the majority of our corporate leaders fail to live up to these expectations and which brings up questions concerning the corporate environments ethical concerns. In response to the question of "Do I think ethics classes would reduce corporate wrong doing", the answer is an enthusiastic no. I really do not foresee that any ethic classes are able to redeem the corporations from their wrong doing in any way, shape or form. If one were to consider a philosophy known as corporate social responsibility we would eventually discover that the program is actually nothing less than a series of eye candy intended to align their corporate activities with the expectations obtained from the stakeholders. It is in effect a large public relations program.

When a university student finds that he can not calculate simple advanced mathematical problems the university will assign that student to remedial math classes. Similarly at the public servant level, states are taking a similar stance. They are forcing state officials to take curative ethics courses. With this growing popularity of ethics classes several years ago, I signed up for an ethics training course, compliments of the state of California. The course was established by the California State Attorney's office to satisfy the 2005 state law which required such training for all state and local public officials.

The California law, AB 1234 makes it mandatory that the official complete this course within six months of being hired. They have also established requirement to take a refresher course at two-year intervals.

Assuming that similar courses would be established for the corporate leadership, I would have to say that the program would be a failure if not properly managed. First off, as is noticeable with AB 1234, one can not dictate the proper ethics which should be followed. This is something that must be nurtured and developed by the individual himself. Then we encounter the age-old inquiry of how one goes about judging what is actually ethical? When examples are presented concerning this uncertainty of ethics we discover that sporadically the message is clear while at other times it emerges as foggy or undefined. It is not always easy to see the demarcation lines of this.

David Robinson and Chris Garratt in their book "Introducing Ethics" argued that the constant erosion of morals has resulted in a society drained of its values. However, in a time magazine article entitled "Summer of Mistrust" the magazine reported that 72 percent of American's polled feared that public issues concerning ethics were not isolated examples but rather the norm in company's efforts to deceive the people. Adding to this malcontent we discover the American people are utterly sick of the openly unethical dealings which they read in their daily newspaper. To this I too must agree.

I would have to declare that the most common cause as to why ethics fails would be that mankind generally does those actions which are most convenient. By it's very definition an ethical dilemma is defined as an unpleasant choice which relates to a moral principle. It is usually much simpler to do that which is easy to accomplish as opposed to what could be construed as right and proper when confronted by such confusing issues. I feel human beings are prone towards failing personal ethics conditions.

In today's competitive business world CEOs and business leaders do that which is necessary to win. Most people hate being a loser and this is especially noticeable in a business environment. We discover business leaders who are confronted with either winning or being ethical. We have all heard the old saying which relates to how the good guy always finishes last and those that want to win believe that by embracing ethics they would greatly limit their options and opportunities for succeed.

Often people consider morals and ethics as similar peas in different pods however there is a basic fundamental difference. Morals are the fabric where ones personal character is defined whereas ethics presents the actual social system where ones morals can be applied. To phrase it in a slightly different manner, ethics develops from standards of behavior which is expected within society.

A typical example involving ethics and morals would be during a criminal trial the defense attorney may believe that his personal moral code is contradictory to committing murder as the offender has done however the attorneys ethics advises him that his accused client must be defended faithfully even when he knows the party involved is guilty as charged. His ethics demands this defense even in sight of the fact that if freed of this crime the offender would likely commit additional offenses. We see in this case where the legal ethics overrides the personal morals in order to uphold justice.

Fortunately, we are seeing an increased interest in evaluating ethical business practices however as with the California ethics course it can not be peddled as a mandatory course and expected results. It is essentially a new era of understanding for the business leaders where most of the glamour has been removed. Changes in corporate strategies often reveal that clients want key corporate executives who not only can make the company money but also are willing to take a stand on tough ethical decisions which involve integrity and moral values.

My personal philosophy towards ethics is that I do want to be an ethical person as do my fellow human beings. This would indicate that yes perhaps in the future ethics classes may help to a degree towards correcting unethical corporate behavior however we must always remember ethics is never a political issue, a social issue or a business issue. It is purely a personal issue.

Copyright @2012 - Joseph Parish

For more information relating to survival visit us at http://www.survival-training.info/


View the original article here

Wednesday, 24 October 2012

2012 Republican Ethics

Since the late 1970s I have followed political candidates and each party's platform with a personal blend of inquisitiveness, awe and learning. I began my political fascination in the Democratic camp under Jimmy Carter, switched to the Republican side under Ronald Reagan and back to the Democratic platform when Bill Clinton came into the picture. During Clinton's presidency I changed my affiliation of record to "Independent" as I saw strong candidates on both sides of the political arena that had something worthwhile to offer.

I wanted to know what each candidate's vision, values, candor, sincerity, track record, "personability" and aura of "presidentialism" traits were firsthand. In my years of political enthrallment I would watch each political party's entire convention. I saw teamwork, support, guidance and revelation in the political discourse on both sides. I studied every candidate and made informed decisions of my own accord instead of following the public consensus of what I regarded as an uninformed majority. Too many people know very little but they speak it fluently. Politics can be grand. It has weeded out the weak candidates and given the public a means to identify our leader(s). Government is after all... for the people.

2012 however, has redefined what political leadership is, or can be. The Republican Party (RP) once touted that they were part of the "Moral Majority" implying that they had God on their side and would only do the right things. In August 2004 for example, on CBS's 60 Minutes, President George W. Bush was asked "Before declaring war on Iraq, did you consult with your father (ex-President George H. W. Bush)?" Bush replied, "No. I consulted with a higher Father."

Today, the RP carries an intangible air of superiority. The platform resonates with such banners as "kill abortion with forced vaginal probe ultrasounds," marriage sanctity definitions, medicare reductions, repeal of medical care for ALL Americans (i.e.- Obamacare) and protection for the wealthy from modest taxation to build America whole again. Their basic arithmetic however does not add up. Because Republican members blend faith into the mix with their rhetoric they imply that God continues to be somehow on their side and the enemies are Democrats who are weakening the genetic pool of America.

Misguided, uninformed "moral" arguments are pervasive in our daily discourse cloaked with fear and confusion BUT in 30 years of following the political landscape I have never witnessed so much incompetence, racism and blatant lies in the political debate, primarily from Republicans. Newt Gingrich wants to replace janitors with the students themselves in our elementary schools, and even colonize the moon!? Herman Cain's excuses his lack of world knowledge because he is a "leader not a reader?" Mitt Romney discounts the 47% of Americans who reap rewards earned in Social Security benefits, veteran benefits or unemployment benefits and frowns on those who earn subsistence income that is below the thresholds of Federal tax liability. Grand Cayman accounts, China investments, off-shoring, reckless war mongering rhetoric, Veteran oversight errors, self-deportation suggestions, company closures and tax relief for the wealthy paint Romney as a flip flopping puppet of the elite that cannot run a campaign, let alone a country.

Deceptive ads from Romney, American Crossroads aka Karl Rove and the RP are considered "acceptable" as long as they are anti-Obama; turning a blind eye to ethical competition casts a deep shadow on the integrity of the candidates. Rush Limbaugh diatribes insult the intellect to earn a buck. John Boehner's criticism of President Obama for his "lack of focus" on the economy ring hollow when he has the House of Representatives debating whether "In God We Trust" should be our national motto, Paul Ryan's claim for political clout that a GM plant that shut down in Janesville, WI (his hometown) should be blamed on Obama when he knows Obama was not President at the time are just a few examples of falsehoods and misinformation campaigns. To add more insult to the American intellect, Fox News and Sean Hannity for example, surreptitiously combine protest footage between the Spring and Fall to imply "big problems in Washington" and then recant saying it was "an inadvertent mistake."

Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority leader, has stated that his top priority is NOT rebuilding the economy but rather to "make Obama a one-term President." Broad-based "objectionism," for the sake of hate, using the American people as pawns, is not leadership. Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachman combine eloquent charm with vitriol to mask truth. This is the highest office in the nation, a Presidential race, which demands honesty, the facts and a sound plan!

It is clear that many in the GOP (aka RP) have lost their moral compass and must now contend with Romney's touted "rolling calamity" campaign. Taking a position that is opposite of your opponent just because it will "differentiate" you from the competition is no sound strategy. Where is the substance?!The fact that both ex-President's Bush could have endorsed Romney in person at the Republican National Convention, yet they abstained, tells a story by itself. Jindal, Christie and Santorum surrogates have seemingly abandoned their front-runner. If only Wishy-Washy Republicans could "etch-a-sketch" themselves into new leaders maybe we could start to have earnest discussion with individuals who have the intellect, desire, forthrightness, ability and desire to really move our collective America into the future... TOGETHER!

Enrique Ruiz, CDE, CM, MBA, PgMP
http://www.americasdiversityleader.com/

Enrique Ruiz (Rick) is President of PositivePsyche.Biz Corp. His global expertise spans commercial, defense and IT industries on two continents. He has a successful track record of building diverse, dynamic and multicultural teams with workforces up to 15,000 strong. He is a Hispanic-American that has lived in 3 countries and worked in four. He is fluent in Spanish, studied other languages and engaged in several faiths. He has published several books and provides consulting, training and speaking services on leadership, program management and diversity management.


View the original article here