Pages

Showing posts with label French. Show all posts
Showing posts with label French. Show all posts

Sunday, 2 December 2012

The French and Indian War - War For The Empire

The War For The Empire

Who would control the New World was the question that still needed to be answered? The struggle for North America had many phases. The Dutch lost New Netherland by 1664, the Spanish were chiefly concerned in strengthening themselves in Central and South America, the Swedes lost their foothold in the Delaware River valley to the Dutch when their forts were captured, so by the middle of the 18th century the lines were drawn between the French and the English, as to who would control America.

Both coveted control of the Atlantic fisheries and the western territories of America. It was no comfort to the English as they learned the French were stringing trading posts and forts across the Great Lakes region and were befriending the Indians by keeping them well supplied, persuading them to attack and destroy the English settlements in the west.

These things set the stage for a great war for the empire, the French and Indian War. The French and Indian War was the American stage of a world-wide, nine-year war between 1754 and 1763.

The Ohio Valley

This Great War for the Empire began over a specific issue, as to whether the upper Ohio Valley was a part of the British Empire or part of the French Empire. But even greater issues were evident, which language, form of government, and social patterns were to dominate the heart of the continent of North America.

Both England and France thought they had rightful claims, due to earlier discoveries in the names of their countries. First, Cabot's discoveries of the North American continent in the later part of the 15th Century, and then in the 17th Century, the English laid claim on all lands from French Canada to and north of Spanish Florida, stretching westward to the Pacific Ocean, through the English royal charter. The French, through La Salle's discoveries and possession of the Ohio and Mississippi Valleys, said that America belonged to them.

The conflict between the two nations over North America was inevitable. The French sent troops into the upper Ohio Valley to compel Pennsylvania traders to lower the British flag and retreat to the eastern slopes of the Appalachians. Followed by this unsuccessful attempt to rid the English, the French and their Indian allies attached every English-speaking trader or settler they could find, causing much fear among them.

Virginia Gets Involved

Late in 1753 the news reached Virginia that the French were not only driving out English traders and others, but were building forts on the headwaters of the Allegheny, as well. Young George Washington was sent to warn the French that they were occupying the lands that belonged to Virginia, based on earlier land grants.

After this mission failed, Virginia decided to occupy what is now Pittsburg by building a fort where the Allegheny and Mononagahela Rivers joined. George Washington and his troops, sent by Virginia to defend the fort, were overtaken and forced to surrender. This clash between the French and English brought on the Great War for the Empire, which ultimately spread from the Ohio Valley to every part of the world where either of the two nations had territorial interests.

The government of Virginia appealed to the King of England for assistance, asking for troops to be sent to help rid the French from the Ohio Valley. During the first four years of fighting between the French and English, France held the upper hand, dealing many defeats to the British/Colonial troops. It seemed that the French would succeed in enclosing the British colonials to the east of the Appalachian Mountain barrier, sealing their fate to be nothing but an Atlantic seaboard people.

The Man Of The Hour

However, William Pitt, the English prime minister, with great zeal, dedicated himself to bring victory to England and the colonists. He found first class military leaders, such as Generals Amherst, Wolfe, and Forbes; he recruited new regiments of regulars to replace or re-enforce the old shattered ones; he persuaded Parliament to grant him almost unlimited funds; he promised the colonies a liberal reimbursement of their expenses if they would do their part in furnishing soldiers; and finally, every important detail with respect to operations in North America came under his personal direction.

In Pitt's favor were three things that caused him to overwhelm his opponents:

The growing superiority of the British navy, which would cut off troops and supplies to the French in North AmericaBritain's financial state was much greater than that of nearly bankrupt FranceBritish troops and the colonials became seasoned fighters

In time, the tide turned in North America. Amherst captured Louisbourg in 1758, closing the Gulf of St. Lawrence; Fort Frontenas, Fort Duquesne, and Fort Niagara were compelled to surrender; and Wolfe won the Battle of the Heights of Abraham, which led to the fall of Quebec. Montreal surrendered to Amherst in 1760, completing the conquest of Canada.

Although these series of victories did not end the War for the Empire, the French and Indian parts of it was over. With the ratification of the Peace of Paris in 1763, the supreme issue was definitely settled as to whether the English-speaking people or the French-speaking people would assume the chief responsibility for shaping the destinies of the North American continent.

Visit Fred Fishburne's website, The Story of America, where he shares the American story from its beginnings in concise segments at: http://thestoryofamerica.org/.


View the original article here

Friday, 19 October 2012

Help! They Are Swimming - And Speaking French!

Local elections are coming up soon in Belgium. As always local elections have turned into quasi-national elections and in Belgium this means the continued existence of the country is called into question once more.

According to a recent poll commissioned by various Belgian newspapers and broadcasters the N-VA remains the largest party in Flanders. With 36.7% of voters in Flanders expressing their intention to vote for Bart De Wever's Flemish ultra-nationalist party and a further 11.1% of votes intended for Vlaams Belang (the Flemish neo-fascists), nearly 50% of the Flemish population favours separatist parties.

Traditional Flemish parties such as the Christian Democrats (CD&V), the Liberals (Open VLD) and the Socialists (SP-A) together would collect only just above 38% of the Flemish vote.

Ultra-nationalism and separatism have firmly taken root in Flemish politics. Whereas the ridiculously convoluted intricacies of the Belgian political system often give the impression of a complex situation, it acts as a very handy fog screen behind which the nationalists can hide and blur the argument in order to seem less virulently selfish and, ultimately, fascist.

Because despite all these technicalities, the nationalist rhetoric boils down to the following:

- "Eigen volk eerst!" (Our people first!) - Flanders is financially better off and no longer wants to share with people who do not speak their language or are from different backgrounds. Solidarity has irrevocably left the house.

- "We were there first!" - Flemish nationalists tie ethnic nationalism to territorial nationalism and hence claim territory in the name of the Flemish people who were "there" first at the expense of other cultures. A quasi-sacred quality is sought in the nation and in the popular memories it evokes and requires the establishment of a mass, public culture based on common values and traditions of the population.

- "Fear of the other" - Flemish nationalists are scared of people who are not like them and ultimately fear that their "nation" and culture are not resilient enough to handle outside influences from other cultures. Xenophobia bears the hallmarks of a weak culture constructed on a myth.

The following are just a few examples of how Flemish nationalism is actively discriminating against other people:

- The Flemish "Wooncode" requests that persons seeking public or social housing, in Flanders, prove their knowledge in Dutch. They will otherwise be turned down.

- The Flemish are calling on all French-speaking inhabitants of Flemish towns and cities to integrate, including those people who have lived their entire lives in mainly French-speaking municipalities. The NVA insists for French speaking Belgians that live on Flemish territory to prove their "level of integration". If found insufficient, they should be obliged to take Flemish classes and courses fostering greater integration.

- In Overijse, close to Brussels, a slogan hangs above the swimming pool with the words "ik zwem, jij zwemt, wij zwemmen, in het Nederlands" (I swim, you swim, we swim, in Dutch). This is a variation on the ubiquitous "ik speel, jij speelt, wij spelen, in het Nederlands" (I play, you play, we play, in Dutch), an initiative of the province of Flemish Brabant that saw the distribution of 350 banners to decorate playgrounds encouraging kids to speak Dutch. 32 municipalities rushed to acquire such banners.

- The Flemish sports association, Bloso, controlled by the Flemish government, runs sports activities and camps. But Bloso also says that children who do not speak or understand Flemish can be sent home without a refund.

- A rather legalistic technical issue has resulted in the Flemish refusal to appoint three French mayors democratically elected on the outskirts of Brussels for non-compliance with the use of languages.

- In some towns the public libraries are required to be provided with 80% of books in Dutch, although French-speaking citizens make up the majority.

- In yet other places in Flanders, inhabitants are obliged to know the Dutch language to be able to acquire a property or land.

- Convocation letters to invite citizens to vote can only be sent out in Dutch even in municipalities where the majority of citizens are French speaking.

The list continues, but perhaps the label "non-violent fascism" is not out of place to describe the evolution of Flemish politics. And if polls are anything to go by, the upcoming local elections are only going to make matters worse. After all, it is a well-known fact that scared people are very dangerous when in group.

Arnaud Houdmont wrote this article about Flemish nationalism. Arnaud is a co-founder of Wazi Project,a quarterly online subscription magazine tackling current sociological, political, economic and cultural challenges through the analysis of socio-political trends, critical commentary and comparison of mainstream thinking with cutting-edge approaches. Arnaud has written articles on nationalism, religion, welfare society and other social and political topics that are in need of rethinking.

Wazi Project, the magazine: http://www.waziproject.com/


View the original article here